BMI Calculator

Calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) with WHO international and Asian (WHO 2004) cutoffs, plus waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) for visceral fat risk. Free, accurate BMI calculator with health risk assessment.

cmin
kg
cm
Optional - for waist-to-height ratio (visceral fat risk)
Asian cutoffs: overweight at 23+, obese at 27.5+ (East/South/Southeast Asian heritage).
kg/m2
161718.525303540UnderweightNormalOverweightObesityBMI = 23.15

BMI categories table

BMI CategoryBMI Range (kg/m²)Health Risk
Severe ThinnessLess than 16.0Very high
Moderate Thinness16.0 - 16.9High
Mild Thinness17.0 - 18.4Mild
Normal range18.5 - 24.9Low
Pre-obese (Overweight)25.0 - 29.9Increased
Obese Class I (Moderate)30.0 - 34.9Moderate
Obese Class II (Severe)35.0 - 39.9Severe
Obese Class III (Very Severe)40.0 or moreVery Severe (High risk of comorbidities)

BMI chart

BMI chart
Source: wikimedia

What is BMI?

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a numerical value of a person's weight in relation to their height. It is a widely used screening tool to categorize individuals into various weight categories, which may indicate their level of body fat and potential health risks.

Here's how BMI is defined and used:

Definition:

BMI is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. The formula for BMI is:

BMI(kg/m2) =
mass(kg)height2(m)

In imperial units, the formula is modified to:

BMI(kg/m2) =
mass(lb)height2(in)
× 703

Categories:

BMI values are used to define various weight status categories, such as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity. These categories can provide a quick indication of whether an individual might be at risk for health problems related to their weight.

Limitations:

While BMI is a useful quick screening tool, it has limitations. It does not directly measure body fat, and it does not account for the distribution of fat, muscle, bone mass, overall body composition, or racial and sex differences. Therefore, individuals with a high muscle mass (like athletes) may be categorized as overweight or obese when they are actually healthy.

Use in Healthcare:

Healthcare professionals use BMI along with other assessments, such as skinfold thickness measurements, evaluations of diet, physical activity, family history, and other appropriate health screenings to make informed decisions about an individual's health risks and to recommend interventions.

BMI is not a diagnostic tool on its own. A high or low BMI may indicate the need for further, more direct assessments of body composition and health risk.

Risks associated with being overweight

Being overweight, usually defined as having a Body Mass Index (BMI) over 25. BMI is a widely used measure to categorize weight status and is calculated by dividing a person's weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters. While BMI does not measure body fat directly, it correlates with direct measures of body fat and can be a quick screening tool to identify potential weight problems in adults.

However, it's important to note that BMI does not differentiate between muscle and fat mass, does not take into account the distribution of fat, and may not be accurate for all ethnic groups, athletes, or older individuals.

Here are risks associated with being overweight as determined by a higher BMI:

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • Metabolic Syndrome
  • Sleep Apnea
  • Cancers
  • Gallbladder Disease
  • Fatty Liver Disease
  • Reproductive Problems
  • Psychological Effects
  • Reduced Quality of Life
  • Increased Inflammation

Risks associated with being underweight

Being underweight, typically defined as having a Body Mass Index (BMI) below 18.5, can be just as harmful to your health as being overweight. Here are some of the health risks associated with being underweight:

  • Nutritional Deficiencies
  • Immune System Impairment
  • Osteoporosis
  • Fertility Issues
  • Growth and Development Issues
  • Muscle Wasting
  • Increased Risk of Surgical Complications
  • Heart Problems
  • Pregnancy Risks
  • Hair Loss
  • Skin Issues
  • Feeling Cold

While BMI is a useful indicator of potential health risks, it should be used as part of a broader assessment that includes other health indicators, family history, diet, physical activity, and other factors. Health professionals often use additional measurements, such as waist circumference, to evaluate health risks. It is always recommended to consult with a healthcare provider for a full evaluation and personalized advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

BMI was invented by the Belgian astronomer-statistician Adolphe Quetelet in 1832, originally called the "Quetelet Index". Quetelet was trying to characterize the "average man" using population statistics and explicitly stated his formula (weight in kg divided by height in meters squared) should not be applied to individuals. The name "Body Mass Index" was coined by Ancel Keys in a 1972 Journal of Chronic Diseases paper that compared BMI against several other indices for correlating with body fat in cohort studies. The WHO adopted the current cutoffs (18.5/25/30) in 1995 based on mortality data from the Build Study of America and other insurance-industry cohorts. So the math is 193 years old, the name is 53 years old, and the cutoffs are 30 years old — all developed primarily on adult European populations.

Because population data shows that body weight scales with height squared, not cubed, in healthy adults. If humans scaled isometrically (like geometric similar shapes), weight would scale with height³. But across adult populations, taller people are not proportionally wider and thicker — they're somewhat "stretched out". Quetelet's 1832 analysis of Belgian conscripts found weight grew roughly as the square of height. Modern data confirms the height² exponent is the best empirical fit for adults aged 20-65 (the Ponderal Index uses height³ and works better only for very tall or very short people, infants, and very thin athletes). For most adults, weight/height² gives a number that depends mostly on body fat percentage and minimally on height — which is exactly what makes it a useful screening tool.

Because muscle and bone are denser than fat. A 175 cm bodybuilder at 90 kg has BMI 29.4 ("overweight") with maybe 10% body fat. A 175 cm sedentary person at 70 kg has BMI 22.9 ("normal") with maybe 30% body fat. BMI captures total mass per height² but cannot tell what that mass is made of. This is why a 2013 University of Pennsylvania study found that BMI misclassifies about half of normal-weight women as healthy when they actually have over 30% body fat — the so-called "normal weight obesity" or "skinny fat" pattern, which carries the same metabolic risk as visible obesity. For individuals, supplementary measurements (waist circumference, body fat percentage from DEXA or BIA, blood markers like fasting glucose and lipids) are more informative.

Because at any given BMI, East and South Asian populations have more visceral fat, higher insulin resistance, and worse cardio-metabolic profiles than European-descent populations. The 2004 WHO Expert Consultation reviewed studies from Hong Kong, Japan, India, Singapore, and China and recommended adding two additional cutpoints for Asian populations: 23.0 (at-risk overweight, vs the standard 25.0) and 27.5 (high-risk obesity, vs the standard 30.0). India, Japan, and China have adopted these in their national guidelines; the WHO retains the original cutpoints for international comparability. Practical implication: an Indian or Chinese person at BMI 24 is at higher actual cardio-metabolic risk than a European person at BMI 24. If you're of East/South/Southeast Asian heritage, mentally shift the BMI risk thresholds 2-3 points lower than what this calculator shows.

Probably not by enough to matter for individual decisions. The Prospective Studies Collaboration meta-analysis of 894,576 adults (Lancet 2009) found all-cause mortality was effectively flat across BMI 22.5-25.0, with slight increases below 22.5 (due to age-related sarcopenia and frailty in the elderly) and slight increases above 25.0 (due to cardiovascular disease). Anywhere in BMI 20-25 produced similar life expectancy. The diet industry treats BMI 22 as an aesthetic ideal, but mortality data doesn't support targeting a specific number within the healthy range. Settle where you can maintain naturally with good habits — chasing the lower end at the cost of chronic restriction often triggers weight cycling, which is independently associated with worse health outcomes.

Because children's body composition changes substantially with age and sex. A 5-year-old with BMI 17 is overweight; a 17-year-old with BMI 17 is mildly underweight. The CDC and WHO use age-and-sex-specific BMI percentile charts for children aged 2-19: underweight = under 5th percentile, healthy = 5th to 84th, overweight = 85th to 94th, obese = 95th and above. For children under 2, weight-for-length percentiles are used instead because BMI doesn't yet behave linearly. The bmi-calculator on this site uses adult cutoffs only — child users should use the child-bmi-percentile calculator instead, which applies the CDC growth chart percentile method. For seniors over 65, BMI 25-27 is often associated with the lowest mortality (mild overweight is protective for frailty), which is why elderly nutritional guidelines don't push the under-25 target.

BMI measures overall weight relative to height; waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) measures abdominal fat distribution. The simple rule: "keep your waist less than half your height" (WHtR under 0.5) is healthy for most adults regardless of BMI. A 2010 systematic review by Ashwell et al. found WHtR outperformed BMI as a predictor of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and all-cause mortality across 31 studies. Why: visceral abdominal fat is metabolically active and drives insulin resistance, inflammation, and lipid abnormalities — while subcutaneous fat on hips and thighs is metabolically benign. Two people with the same BMI 28 can have very different WHtR: one with apple-shape (high visceral) is at much higher health risk than one with pear-shape (mostly subcutaneous). For best screening, use BMI + waist circumference together rather than BMI alone.

Yes — as a screening tool at population scale and a starting point for individuals. The strengths: BMI requires only height and weight (no equipment, no training, no privacy), works the same way in any country, correlates strongly enough with body fat at population scale (r ≈ 0.7-0.8) to drive public health policy, and has 30+ years of mortality data backing the cutpoints. Use it to: 1) screen yourself for being substantially over or under healthy weight; 2) track your own trends across years (your personal BMI trajectory is meaningful even if the absolute number is fuzzy); 3) compare apples-to-apples with population averages and trial data. Don't use it to: 1) decide whether a muscular athlete needs to lose weight; 2) diagnose individual obesity without confirmation via body composition or waist measurement; 3) chase a specific BMI target as if it were a goal in itself.
BMI Calculator — Calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) with WHO international and Asian (WHO 2004) cutoffs, plus waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) f
BMI Calculator