Ideal Weight Calculator
Ideal body weight calculator with Robinson, Miller, Devine and Hamwi formulas, BMI category and adjusted body weight (ABW) for medication dosing, metric and imperial.
| Formula | Weight |
|---|---|
| Robinson (1983) | - |
| Miller (1983) | - |
| Devine (1974) | - |
| Hamwi (1964) | - |
| BMI Method | - |
What is Ideal Body Weight?
Ideal body weight (IBW) refers to the optimal weight for a person's height, gender, and body frame. It's a range that suggests what your weight should be to minimize health risks and maximize overall wellness.
There are several scientific formulas developed over the years to estimate ideal body weight, each with its own approach and considerations. Our calculator uses multiple formulas to give you a comprehensive view of your ideal weight range.
Ideal Weight Formulas Explained
Robinson (1983)
The Robinson formula (1983) is a widely used equation that provides a balanced estimate of ideal body weight based on height and gender.
Male: 52 kg + 1.9 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Female: 49 kg + 1.7 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Miller (1983)
The Miller formula (1983) offers similar results to Robinson but with slightly different coefficients, providing an alternative perspective on ideal weight.
Male: 56.2 kg + 1.41 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Female: 53.1 kg + 1.36 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Devine (1974)
The Devine formula (1974) is one of the most commonly used formulas in medical settings, particularly for calculating medication dosages.
Male: 50 kg + 2.3 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Female: 45.5 kg + 2.3 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Hamwi (1964)
The Hamwi formula (1964) is another classic formula that has been used extensively in clinical practice for decades.
Male: 48 kg + 2.7 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
Female: 45.5 kg + 2.2 kg × (Height(cm) - 152.4) / 2.54
BMI Method
The BMI method calculates ideal weight based on a BMI of 22, which is in the middle of the healthy BMI range (18.5-24.9).
Weight = BMI × Height2 (using BMI 18.5-24.9 for healthy range)
Understanding Body Frame
Body frame size is an important factor in determining ideal weight. People with different frame sizes can have different ideal weights even at the same height:
- Small Frame: Narrow shoulders and hips, slender wrists and ankles. Typically requires 10% less weight than medium frame.
- Medium Frame: Average bone structure and proportions. This is the baseline for most ideal weight calculations.
- Large Frame: Broad shoulders and hips, larger wrists and ankles. Can typically carry 10% more weight than medium frame.
Factors Affecting Ideal Weight
- Height: Taller individuals typically have higher ideal weights
- Gender: Males generally have higher ideal weights than females at the same height due to greater muscle mass
- Age: Metabolism and body composition change with age, potentially affecting ideal weight
- Body Frame Size: Bone structure plays a significant role in determining healthy weight
- Muscle Mass: People with more muscle mass may weigh more while still being healthy
- Genetics: Family history and genetic factors influence body composition
- Activity Level: Regular exercise and physical activity affect ideal weight and body composition
Important Considerations
- These formulas provide estimates and guidelines, not absolute targets. Individual variations are normal and healthy.
- Ideal weight is not the same as perfect weight. Health is about more than just a number on the scale.
- Athletes and very muscular individuals may have a higher ideal weight due to increased muscle mass.
- Older adults may have a slightly higher healthy weight range than younger adults.
- Body composition (muscle vs. fat) is more important than weight alone for overall health.
- These calculations are not suitable for children, pregnant women, or individuals with certain medical conditions.
- If you have concerns about your weight or health, consult with a healthcare professional.
- Focus on sustainable healthy habits rather than reaching a specific number on the scale.
Where did the idea of an 'ideal weight' come from and is it still scientifically valid?
It originated in 1959 when the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company published height-weight tables based on the lowest mortality rates among its policyholders. Dr. G.J. Hamwi created the first formula in 1964 (a quick estimate for medication dosing in diabetics), followed by Devine (1974, for aminoglycoside antibiotic dosing), Robinson (1983), and Miller (1983). All were derived from insurance and clinical data of mostly white Americans aged 25-59 — they were never meant to be aesthetic or fitness targets. Modern medicine still uses them for drug dosing (especially for hydrophilic drugs and anesthetics) but considers BMI 18.5-24.9 a more population-valid 'healthy' range. The ideal weight number is a 30-second estimate, not a precise individual target.
How do I calculate Adjusted Body Weight (ABW) for drug dosing?
Adjusted Body Weight is the dosing weight clinicians use when a patient's actual weight is above their ideal body weight (IBW). The equation is ABW = IBW + 0.4 x (actual weight - IBW), where IBW is usually the Devine value. The 0.4 factor accounts for the fact that adipose (fat) tissue is metabolically less active and poorly perfused, so dosing on total body weight would over-dose hydrophilic drugs, while dosing on lean IBW alone would under-dose. ABW is the standard for aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin), and is widely used for loading doses of drugs like vancomycin, acyclovir, and many anesthetic agents in overweight and obese patients. This tool now outputs ABW automatically whenever your entered weight exceeds the Devine IBW; at or below IBW, total body weight is used for dosing and no adjustment applies. Always confirm against your local pharmacy protocol - some drugs (e.g. certain chemotherapy and lipophilic agents) dose on total or lean body weight instead.
Why do the four formulas give different results?
They were derived from different datasets and for different clinical purposes. Hamwi (1964) was eyeballed for diabetic medication dosing. Devine (1974) was statistically fitted for aminoglycoside dosing in inpatients - it tends to read lowest because antibiotics need conservative dosing. Robinson (1983) was a meta-analysis update of older life-insurance data. Miller (1983) was specifically built on a smaller modern sample and reads highest. At a height of 175 cm, the four formulas typically span 67-77 kg for men - a 10 kg spread. The calculator averages them precisely because no single formula is definitively 'right'. The BMI method (target BMI 22, middle of healthy range) is a separate sanity check based on population mortality data rather than insurance tables.
Why do the formulas only work above 152 cm (5 feet)?
Because all four formulas have the form 'base weight + (some factor) × (height in inches above 60)'. If you plug in 5 feet exactly, you get the base weight; below that you get nonsense or negative adjustments. The original 1959-1983 data simply didn't include adults shorter than 5 feet in large numbers - growth disorders and certain ethnic populations were underrepresented. For short adults (under 152 cm), most clinicians use BMI 22 × height² for an ideal weight estimate, which works at any height. The calculator falls back to BMI method or shows an error for inputs below this threshold.
How accurate is body frame size, and how do I really measure it?
The standard medical method is the elbow-breadth measurement: bend your dominant arm 90 degrees at the elbow with palm facing you, then measure the bony width of your elbow with calipers (or a ruler with thumb-and-finger). For men, small frame is under 6.6 cm at 165 cm height (rising with height); medium is 6.6-7.4 cm; large is over 7.4 cm. Women's brackets are about 0.5 cm smaller. A simpler proxy: wrap thumb and middle finger around your opposite wrist - if they overlap, small frame; just touch, medium; don't meet, large. The calculator's ±10% frame adjustment matches the Metropolitan Life table's spread. Wrist circumference correlates with frame at around r=0.7, decent but not precise.
Why does the calculator give a range rather than a single number?
Because there is no single 'right' weight for a given height - it's a range determined by frame size, body composition (muscle vs fat), age, and ethnicity. The calculator's healthy range uses BMI 18.5-24.9 (the WHO healthy-weight band) adjusted for frame, which typically gives a 15-20 kg window at adult heights. The 'average ideal weight' shown is the midpoint of the four classic formulas after frame adjustment, but anywhere inside the healthy range is medically fine. Targeting a single number can become unhealthy psychologically - most weight-loss research finds that 5-10% body weight loss produces nearly all the health benefits, regardless of whether you ever hit your 'ideal'.
Why might my ideal weight be wrong if I'm muscular?
Because the formulas assume average body composition (roughly 15-20% body fat for men, 22-28% for women). A muscular athlete at 'ideal weight + 10 kg' may have lower body fat and better metabolic health than someone at exact ideal weight with high body fat. The classic example: a 180 cm rugby player at 95 kg looks 'overweight' on every formula here (and on BMI) but has 12% body fat and elite cardiovascular fitness. For body-composition-aware targets, the lean body mass calculator or DEXA scan are better tools. Use ideal weight as a starting reference, not a destination, if you're meaningfully muscular.
Are the formulas accurate across different ethnicities?
Not really - this is a well-known limitation. The original tables and equations were calibrated mostly on white North Americans. Studies since 2000 (especially by the WHO Expert Consultation 2004) have shown that Asian populations have higher body fat and cardio-metabolic risk at lower BMIs, so 'ideal weight' should be lower (BMI 18.5-23 as healthy, not 18.5-24.9). African and Pacific Islander populations often have higher lean mass at the same height, so the formula 'ideal' may underestimate by 5-10 kg. The calculator doesn't yet auto-adjust for ethnicity - use the lower end of the range for East/Southeast Asian users, and treat the upper end as more permissive for African heritage users.
If I'm below ideal weight, should I try to gain?
Not automatically. Being a few kg below 'ideal weight' is not the same as being underweight medically. Underweight is BMI under 18.5, which is associated with osteoporosis, fertility issues, and immune compromise. If you're at BMI 19-21, you're in the bottom half of the healthy range, which is associated with the lowest mortality in most large studies (NHANES, UK Biobank). Naturally lean adults with normal energy, regular periods (women), and good lab values are fine where they are. Pursue weight gain only if your BMI is under 18.5, you have unintended weight loss, persistent fatigue, hair loss, or amenorrhea - and pursue it with resistance training plus a 200-300 kcal surplus, not just eating more, so the gain is lean tissue.

