Calculator
MathRoot Calculator
Root calculator for square, cube, and n-th roots. Surd simplification, complex roots, Babylonian method, irrationality of √2 explained.
Have feedback? Report bugs, suggest features, or share your thoughts — we read them allHow to Calculate a Root?
Calculating a root means finding a value that, when raised to a given power, returns the original number — the inverse of exponentiation. The two most common cases are the square root (a value that squared gives back x) and the cube root (a value that cubed gives back x); the nth root generalizes to any positive integer power. All three are computed using the fractional-exponent identity ⁿ√x = x^(1/n), which lets a single algorithm handle the whole family. Below the basic forms and the formulas, the FAQ section covers complex roots of negatives, simplifying surds like √50 = 5√2, the Babylonian / Newton iteration for manual computation, and why ancient Pythagoreans considered the irrationality of √2 a scandal. The reference table at the bottom gives the first twenty square roots to three decimals for quick sanity checks.
1. Square Root (2nd root):
- Find the square root by using the symbol √ or a calculator. Geometrically, √x is the side length of a square with area x.
- Compute the square root manually using the fractional-exponent identity:
- Given a number x ≥ 0, the principal square root √x equals x raised to the power 0.5: √x = x^0.5
- Example: √16 = 16^0.5 = 4. For non-perfect squares like √50, simplify by factoring out perfect squares: √50 = √(25 × 2) = 5√2 ≈ 7.071.
square root = 160.5 = 4
2. Cube Root (3rd root):
- Find the cube root using the symbol ∛ or a calculator. Geometrically, ∛x is the edge length of a cube with volume x.
- Compute the cube root manually using the fractional-exponent identity:
- Given a number x, the cube root ∛x equals x raised to the power 1/3: ∛x = x^(1/3)
- Example: ∛8 = 8^(1/3) = 2. Unlike the square root, the cube root of a negative number is real: ∛(−8) = −2.
cube root = 3√8 = 8(1/3) = 2
3. Nth Root (n-th root):
- Compute the nth root using the fractional-exponent identity:
- Given a number x and the desired root n, the nth root ⁿ√x equals x raised to the power 1/n: ⁿ√x = x^(1/n)
- Example: ⁴√16 = 16^(1/4) = 2. For negative bases, the result is real only when n is odd; when n is even, the result is a complex number.
nth root = 4√16 = 16(1/4) = 2
Roots can leave the real numbers behind. The square root of a negative number is imaginary: √(−1) = i, so √(−9) = 3i. Even roots (n = 2, 4, 6, ...) of negative numbers always have this property; odd roots (n = 3, 5, 7, ...) stay real. The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees that every nonzero number has exactly n distinct nth roots in the complex plane — for n = 2 a positive base has two real roots (±√x), and complex roots arrive in conjugate pairs for any real base.
In practice, most people use calculators or software for roots because they are non-terminating and irrational for almost every input. Even when an answer is exact (√25 = 5, ∛125 = 5), the underlying floating-point evaluation may round in the last digit, so confirm by squaring/cubing the result back to your input.
Frequently Asked Questions
By definition, the principal square root must satisfy (√x)² = x. For positive x this works straightforwardly: √4 = 2, and 2² = 4. For x = −1, there is no real number whose square equals −1, because squaring any real number — positive or negative — produces a non-negative result. Mathematicians extended the number system by defining i = √(−1), with the property i² = −1. This single new symbol unlocks the complex numbers a + bi, which form an algebraically closed field where every polynomial has a root. Once you have i, every square root is defined: √(−9) = √9 × √(−1) = 3i, and quadratic equations with negative discriminants have solutions (the formula −b ± √(b² − 4ac), divided by 2a, just produces complex output when b² − 4ac < 0). The historical name "imaginary" was originally pejorative, coined by Descartes in 1637, but complex numbers turned out to be indispensable for AC electrical engineering, quantum mechanics, signal processing, fluid dynamics, and pretty much anything involving rotations or oscillations.
Because of the parity of the exponent. (−x)² = x² always gives a positive number, so no real number squared equals a negative — that's why √(−4) lives outside the reals. (−x)³ = −x³, which is negative whenever x is positive, so cubing a negative real produces a negative real — meaning the inverse, the cube root of a negative, must be a real negative number. Specifically, ∛(−8) = −2 because (−2)³ = −8. The general rule: ⁿ√(−x) is real if and only if n is odd. For even n (n = 2, 4, 6, ...), all n complex nth roots of a negative come in conjugate pairs centered on the imaginary axis, and none is real. For odd n (n = 3, 5, 7, ...), exactly one of the n complex roots is real and negative; the rest are conjugate complex pairs. This calculator returns the real root when one exists (the principal real root), and signals an error or returns the complex magnitude when one doesn't.
A surd is a square root (or higher-order root) that doesn't evaluate to a rational number — √2, √7, ∛5 are all surds. Simplifying a surd means pulling out any perfect-square (or perfect-nth-power) factors from under the radical, leaving the smallest possible number inside. The procedure for square roots: (1) factor the number under the radical into primes; (2) pair up identical primes; (3) move each pair outside as a single factor; (4) leave any unpaired primes inside. Example: √72 — factor 72 = 2³ × 3² = 4 × 2 × 9 = 36 × 2. Pull out √36 = 6, leaving √2 inside. So √72 = 6√2 ≈ 8.485. Another: √48 = √(16 × 3) = 4√3. Why bother? Simplified surds are easier to combine algebraically (2√3 + 5√3 = 7√3, but √12 + √75 looks unrelated until you simplify them to 2√3 + 5√3), and they preserve exactness — 5√2 is precise, 7.0710678... is rounded. Calculus, geometry proofs, and exact-form answers in algebra all prefer simplified surds. For nth roots, the same idea generalizes: pull out perfect nth powers, leave the rest inside.
The Babylonian method (also called Heron's method, or Newton-Raphson applied to f(g) = g² − x) is the most practical hand technique and converges in just a few iterations. Algorithm to find √x: (1) Guess g, any positive starting value — a rough estimate near √x is fine. (2) Replace g with (g + x/g) / 2 — the average of g and x/g. (3) Repeat step 2 until the answer stabilizes. Example for √20: start with g = 4. Iteration 1: (4 + 20/4)/2 = (4 + 5)/2 = 4.5. Iteration 2: (4.5 + 20/4.5)/2 = (4.5 + 4.444)/2 = 4.4722. Iteration 3: (4.4722 + 20/4.4722)/2 = 4.47214. The true value is 4.47213595... — three iterations got us 7 correct digits. The Babylonian method doubles the number of correct digits each iteration (quadratic convergence), which is why it's still used in hardware floating-point sqrt implementations on most CPUs. The method dates to ancient Babylonian clay tablets c. 1800 BCE — by far the oldest computational algorithm in continuous use today.
For positive real x, yes — all three notations give the same value, the principal (positive) square root. √16 = 16^(1/2) = 16^0.5 = 4. But the equivalence quietly breaks for negative or complex bases, because the expression x^(1/2) raises a question that √x answers by convention. The square root symbol √ refers specifically to the principal square root: for positive x it returns the positive root (√4 = +2, not −2); for negative real x it returns the positive imaginary root (√(−4) = +2i). The notation x^(1/2) can mean either of those, and ambiguity arises if you chain it with the power rule. For instance, applying (x²)^(1/2) = x is only true when x ≥ 0; for x = −3, (−3)² = 9 and √9 = 3, not −3. Most calculators (this one included) implement x^0.5 as a synonym for the principal √x, but if you are doing symbolic algebra you must track sign conventions and possibly multi-valued roots explicitly. Same caveat applies to higher fractional exponents and the nth root function.
Because it overturned the Pythagorean philosophy that all relationships in nature could be expressed as ratios of integers. The Pythagorean school, around 500 BCE, taught that geometry, music, and the universe itself were built on whole-number proportions — 2:3 made a musical fifth, 3:4 a fourth, and so on. When the diagonal of a unit square turned out to have length √2, they could prove (by what we now call a proof by contradiction) that no fraction p/q in lowest terms could equal √2: any such fraction would force both p and q to be even, contradicting the lowest-terms assumption. Tradition says the discoverer, Hippasus of Metapontum, was either drowned at sea or expelled for revealing this scandal — though the story is probably exaggerated. The deeper consequence was that the Greeks had to develop the theory of "magnitudes" (Eudoxus's later work) separately from numbers, a split that persisted until the 19th century, when Dedekind and Cantor finally constructed the real numbers rigorously. Today every high-school proof of √2's irrationality uses essentially the same Pythagorean argument.
Every nonzero complex number has exactly n distinct nth roots, evenly spaced around the origin at angle increments of 2π/n. For n = 2 (square roots), there are two roots that differ in sign — √4 has roots +2 and −2. For n = 3 (cube roots), there are three roots — one real and two complex conjugates for a positive base; one real and two complex conjugates for a negative base. The principal nth root, by convention, is the unique value with the smallest positive argument (angle) in the complex plane: for positive real x, the principal nth root is the positive real root; for negative real x and odd n, the principal nth root is the negative real root; for negative real x and even n, the principal nth root is on the positive imaginary axis (or its closest analog). This calculator returns the principal real root when one exists; for complex-only roots (negative base with even n), behavior depends on the n: for n = 2 it can return the imaginary root, and for higher even n you may need a complex-number tool. The full set of n roots is found by multiplying the principal root by the nth roots of unity, e^(2πki/n) for k = 0, 1, ..., n−1.
Square roots appear constantly in physics, engineering, statistics, and computer science. Pythagorean distance (√(x² + y²)) underlies everything from GPS location to game physics to neural-network gradient norms. Standard deviation in statistics is √(variance) — the square root pulls the unit back to the original measurement. Quadratic-formula solutions, period of a pendulum (T = 2π√(L/g)), kinetic-energy rearrangement to velocity (v = √(2E/m)), AC circuit impedance, RMS (root mean square) in audio engineering, and the inverse-square law of gravity and electromagnetism all involve square roots. Cube roots appear in volumetric scaling: if you triple the linear size of a 3D object, its volume scales by 27, so to volume-scale by N you need a linear scale of ∛N. The metric Mach number in supersonics, the period of orbital mechanics (Kepler's third law involves a^(3/2)), and concrete-mix scaling all use cube roots. Higher nth roots show up in compound interest annualization, in moments of inertia, and in the relativistic Lorentz factor 1/√(1 − v²/c²) which has √ at its heart. Almost no quantitative discipline is root-free.
Square roots table
| Number (x) | Square Root (√n) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1.414 |
| 3 | 1.732 |
| 4 | 2 |
| 5 | 2.236 |
| 6 | 2.449 |
| 7 | 2.646 |
| 8 | 2.828 |
| 9 | 3 |
| 10 | 3.162 |
| 11 | 3.317 |
| 12 | 3.464 |
| 13 | 3.606 |
| 14 | 3.742 |
| 15 | 3.873 |
| 16 | 4 |
| 17 | 4.123 |
| 18 | 4.243 |
| 19 | 4.359 |
| 20 | 4.472 |
MATH CALCULATORS32
WUTOOLS